Advanced Search
Search

RFA FORT ROSALIE A385 - IMO 7341283

< Previous PhotoNext Photo >
Ship
2,87110
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Emmanuel.L [ View profile ]
Captured:
Sep 16, 2011
Location:
Valletta, Malta
Photo Category:
Auxiliaries
Added:
Sep 25, 2011
Views:
2,871
Image Resolution:
3,367 x 1,874

Description:

Royal navy auxiliary FORT ROSALIE A385 leaving harbour.

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
FORT ROSALIE

Former name(s):

 -  Fort Grange (Until 2000 Jun)

Vessel Type:
Replenishment Vessel
Gross tonnage:
20,043 tons
Summer DWT:
8,300 tons

AIS Position
of this ship

There is no AIS Position Data available for this ship!

Would you like to add AIS Coverage?

Add AIS Coverage

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

Shipping - 1 photos

Ship Interior - 2 photos

Ships under Repair or Conversion - 4 photos

Auxiliaries - 94 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(40)

kevin blair

3 photos

John Eyres

1 photos

matros65

1 photos

Eddie Walker

1 photos

Bob

1 photos

Barry Graham

11 photos

Derek

1 photos

Helseambob

1 photos

Michel FLOCH

5 photos

Dave Forbes

2 photos

Robbie Shaw

2 photos

Neil Haste

1 photos

Trevor Dry

2 photos

Neil Watkin

1 photos

Robert Foy

3 photos

LPX

1 photos

John O Neill

2 photos

Emmanuel.L

5 photos

Gaviota

2 photos

TARBATNESS

11 photos

phil1610

1 photos

msd.deeview

1 photos

jeffess

2 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(10)

Newest First
person
Thanks Shaun for the link,at least it is great to see this fine ship at least still in existence instead of having her life terminated at some Indian or Turkish shipbreaking yard.

Edit
comment

person

Edit
comment

person
Hi Emmanuel.L. Here is a picture of her mothballed in Liverpool.

Edit
comment

person
They'll be going long beyond the arrival of the new Tide class, the replacement stores ships first identified in the MARS proposal all those years ago still haven't been ordered!
Still it's all about short term economics, order a new ship now would cost x millions, but to continue putting these old ships through more and more extensive refits costs y millions less, even though over the long run it'll be more expensive.
Still, it's only tax payers money, a notion totally alien to the MOD.

Edit
comment

person
James: what do you expect, it's a navy, they're not known to spend their money wisely anywhere in the world.
But seriously: I think the idea is to keep these ships going utill the new MARS tankers arrive from Daewoo.

Edit
comment

person
All the same, a hell of a lot of money has been spent keeping these two ships going when they are both well overdue for replacement. Alas the latest refit has spoiled their lines somewhat with Phalanx now fitted on the monkey island and large bright orange lifeboats replacing what can be seen here.

Edit
comment

person
I think she is receiving the same lengthy refit as her sister FORT AUSTIN, which is back in service and looking great again.

Edit
comment

person
I would not worry about that. The RFA mothball their ships here always. They take turns to be mothballed. In 2011, it was fort Victoria's turn.

Edit
comment

person
Though built in 1978, about 36 years ago she still she still possesses a lot of potential in some other navy. Hope she doesn't get scrapped eventually.

Edit
comment

person
Nice to see her in service, she has now been mothballed our port of Liverpool for going on 2 years now .

Edit
comment