Advanced Search
Search

BELLE - IMO 7340693

< Previous PhotoNext Photo >
Ship
1,1483
FavoriteComment
More
Full Screen
Exfir Data
Download Photo

Photo
details

Photographer:
Malcolm Cranfield [ View profile ]
Captured:
Apr 21, 1984
Title:
Belle
Photo Category:
Sd 14's
Added:
May 17, 2018
Views:
1,148
Image Resolution:
3,975 x 2,442

Description:

Malborough Shipping Company (P.G.Margaronis)'s 1974 SD14 variant BELLE is seen swinging in the River Mersey, departing from Liverpool on 21st April 1984, bound for Rotterdam following discharge of a part cargo of north west Indian sunflower seed extract and rice bran for use in animal feedstuffs.

EX-BELLE ROSE-83
Later:1991:KATERINA 1993:OCEAN HO (North Korean)
1999: JANG DAE SAN wrecked 21.7.99
scrapped Gadani Beach 2001/2

Vessel
particulars

Current name:
JANG DAE SAN

Former name(s):

 -  Katerina (Until 1993 Oct)

 -  Belle (Until 1991)

 -  Belle Rose (Until 1983)

 -  Ocean Ho (Until 2018 Nov 30)

Status:
Dead
Build year:
1974
Vessel Type:
General Cargo
Gross tonnage:
8,831 tons
Summer DWT:
15,143 tons

AIS Position
of this ship

There is no AIS Position Data available for this ship!

Would you like to add AIS Coverage?

Add AIS Coverage

Photo
Categories

This ship exists in the following categories:

SD 14's - 19 photos

Photographers
of this ship

(8)

DEREK SANDS

1 photos

Jon Godsell

1 photos

friendship

1 photos

Frafo

3 photos

Chris Howell

1 photos

Paul Tunney

5 photos

COMMENT THIS PHOTO(3)

Newest First
person
Dennis I think you miss the point. The design or class name is implicit of the ships purpose "SD 14" as in standard design. It was a very successful design and suited the ship owners demands. I sailed on this class of a ship for a considerable time and believe me from a marine engineering stand point they were simply superb. A four cylinder Sulzer RNDM main engine that ran like a sowing machine combined with three Allen generators.

Edit
comment

person
Dennis, I disagree - this design was purpose built for the needs of ship and cargo owners in that era and she lasted for 25 years (and longer but for the casualty) which is longer than many of today's containerships survive. Your comment would however be appropriate for many other post-war British built ships.

Edit
comment

person
A prime example how of britain lagged behind the rest of the post-war world in ship design.

Edit
comment